Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could be proven:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.


↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> CONCAT2(u, v)
LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> LESS_LEAVES2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))
LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> CONCAT2(w, z)
CONCAT2(cons2(u, v), y) -> CONCAT2(v, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> CONCAT2(u, v)
LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> LESS_LEAVES2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))
LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> CONCAT2(w, z)
CONCAT2(cons2(u, v), y) -> CONCAT2(v, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 2 SCCs with 2 less nodes.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONCAT2(cons2(u, v), y) -> CONCAT2(v, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


CONCAT2(cons2(u, v), y) -> CONCAT2(v, y)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [17,21] with Interpretation:

POL( CONCAT2(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2


POL( cons2(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2 + 1



The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof
          ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> LESS_LEAVES2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].


The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.


LESS_LEAVES2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> LESS_LEAVES2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Polynomial Order [17,21] with Interpretation:

POL( concat2(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2


POL( leaf ) = 1


POL( LESS_LEAVES2(x1, x2) ) = x1


POL( cons2(x1, x2) ) = x1 + x2 + 1



The following usable rules [14] were oriented:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))



↳ QTRS
  ↳ DependencyPairsProof
    ↳ QDP
      ↳ DependencyGraphProof
        ↳ AND
          ↳ QDP
          ↳ QDP
            ↳ QDPOrderProof
              ↳ QDP
                ↳ PisEmptyProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

concat2(leaf, y) -> y
concat2(cons2(u, v), y) -> cons2(u, concat2(v, y))
less_leaves2(x, leaf) -> false
less_leaves2(leaf, cons2(w, z)) -> true
less_leaves2(cons2(u, v), cons2(w, z)) -> less_leaves2(concat2(u, v), concat2(w, z))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.